I will confess: i skipped about four chapters. The three in which Pinker responds to political objections and the one chapter about art. the chapter about art felt out of place, and is 10 years out of date. The other three I skipped because I need no convincing: The Blank Slate is namely about how evolutionary psychology is true and the idea of "humans being born with blank minds" being testably untrue. Note, Pinker has never started out as an evolutionary psychologist. He is a linguist, and his study of language has lead him to evolutionary psychology. He talks about, when discussing children, that it is a useful theory. The book has lots and lots of evidence, and about 30% of its pages are just notes and appendicies relating to these studies. I felt like Pinker was bringing his full on offensive game, and he pulls no punches. He trashes Margaret Mead and other "blank slatists" who he says deny human nature. It is a must read book for understanding human nature. |
Friday, February 14, 2014
Review: The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: Group Chat Meme
tl;dr: To endorse the concept that European borders are to blame for developing world conflict is to endorse problematic concepts of nationa...

-
I am intimately aware of the errors in my thoughts and the sins of my soul. I can hear the Type-A asshole screaming like a stolen mind in t...
-
People get the cosmic calendar wrong: The universe is not old. It is not old and wise and dirty. We tell that story to wrench dogmatic minds...
-
Uncommon Grounds is a great book, and points to what I think is an overlooked section of history: the history of things. We have lots of boo...
No comments:
Post a Comment